The case laws on temporary resicence ordinance 2015 Diaries
The case laws on temporary resicence ordinance 2015 Diaries
Blog Article
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by regulation." It can be perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and apply Section 302, emphasizing the importance of a fair and just legal system. It is actually critical for society to understand the gravity of this offense plus the need for stringent punishment to prevent likely offenders and make sure justice with the victims and their family members.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fire-arm injury which was fatal to your deceased was caused through the petitioner but in support of opinion of your Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is out there within the file and mere ipsi dixit of police just isn't binding over the Court.
Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to work as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application with the death penalty or life imprisonment depends over the specifics of each case, such as any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques used by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological facets allows to get a more extensive legal reaction.
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for that loss of a life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment on the offender, ensuring they are held accountable for their actions.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
department concerned shall supply the complete set of ACRs of your concerned officer to DPC effectively in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
Knowledge in the accused is a matter to be inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is quite challenging to be proved otherwise.”
In the event the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only carried out In the event the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence and also the petitioner company responded on the allegations as such here they were well aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
13309-B of 2010 for being weak types of evidence as well as the evidentiary value whereof would be witnessed for the time of the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, thus, confirmed custody on the petitioner in jail is unlikely to serve any advantageous purpose at this stage.”
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are thoroughly different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--